Skip to main content

ACE Update 04.10.18: Transparency; Negotiations–A Reality Check; Classification Study–What The Delay?; Seniority; and Layoffs Rights

President’s Message

Transparency

Transparency.  It’s a word you will hear a lot as we navigate these budget reductions but what does it really mean? According to Webster, transparency is the quality or state of being transparent, which is characterized by visibility or accessibility of information especially concerning business practices. Transparency doesn’t happen by accident.  It takes conscious effort, patience, a willingness to ask questions and a willingness to listen. Most importantly, for transparency to have any legitimacy, it isn’t what is said but what is done. If words and actions don’t match, it means nothing.

At this point, we all want to know what is happening and how we are going to be impacted by these forces that are out of our control. And we deserve honest, candid, clear and detailed information from the people who make these decisions.  There are the usual sources for information addressing budget reductions – College Council, PaRC, District Budget Advisory Committee, along with their shared governance subcommittees (FH and DA). Ultimately, they’re supposed to tell us what is going to happen but it’s the conversations in department meetings and communication from our supervisors, or lack there of, that tell the real story. It is also the point in this story where fact and rumor tend to become interchangeable, often with dire consequences. Before you repeat something, ask yourself how you know it to be true?  I’m a big fan of getting things in writing. Ultimately, some people will lose their jobs, those left will lose colleagues, and neither of those scenarios are a desirable outcome. Be kind.

Here is were ACE needs your help.  To get to the facts, ask questions.  Where does the work go?  What are our priorities as a department, as an institution? Shared governance meetings are open to all staff.  If something seems off or you’re told not to ask questions or discuss changes, contact ACE.  I’ve said this before but it is worth repeating “it takes active participation and commitment from all the members of ACE to effectively protect and serve the membership as a whole.”

Transparency also applies to ACE. What are we doing? Last September, we updated you on what ACE has done over the past year and that work continues. Our board members serve on all major shared governance committees and we are committed to sharing factual information through this newsletter, at site meetings, in conversations with members, and our website. You can help by sharing this information with your colleagues.  One of our greatest strengths as an organization, and why we chose to be an independent, comes from our unfettered access to legal representation. It is this access which provides ACE with the experience, and leverage, we need when the District decides to not play by the rules. Read on to find out what ACE is doing today regarding negotiations, the classification study, seniority, and our role during layoffs, including what constitutes a reorganization and what your rights are if you are laid off. 

Of service,

Chris White, ACE President
(650) 949-7789, office

“The fight is never about lettuce or grapes.  It is always about people”. – César Chávez


Negotiations Update: A Reality Check

Cathleen Monsell, Chair of Negotiations

The 2017-18 Governor’s budget includes a 1.56% cost of living adjustment (COLA). For Foothill-De Anza (FHDA), this translates to a little over $2 million. An additional $4.2 million in ongoing funding to our base apportionment was also included in the budget.  Overall, FHDA received a little over $6 million in ongoing general funds for this year.  Cognizant that a loss in enrollment means a loss in revenue – and potential layoffs for staff – in negotiations ACE proposed a one-time payment of $1500 per employee for 2017-18.

The cost for this one-time salary adjustment would be covered by the $38 million in one-time money – described as stability and carry forward funds – the District has been able to save over the past decade.  The District has presented one budget town hall after another defining how $23 million of these funds will help us buy time as we work to increase enrollment (revenue) while permanently reducing our budget. In all of these scenarios, the one fund which never gets touched is the $15 million set aside as carry forward.  These funds have been around for well over a decade and, for some unknown reason, continue to be off limits.  Says who?  Not the board of trustees.

On March 22nd, ACE received a response to our proposal.  Due to the budget crisis brought on by declining enrollment the District emphatically informed us that no one would receive a COLA – either through a one-time payment or an ongoing increase – for the next two years. End of discussion.  ACE’s response to this edict? No.

It is true that the District needs to permanently reduce ongoing expenses by $10 million. Continued enrollment losses this year most likely mean reductions are closer to $15 million.  The District has had two years to reverse this trend and has been unable to do so. To be clear, the responsibility for this loss lies squarely at the administrations feet.  Staff and faculty have gone above and beyond to assist in the recruitment and retention of students. To support this effort, ACE didn’t ask for compensation from ongoing funds so we could retain as many staff as possible to serve students and still give the District an opportunity to invest in the employees they purport to value.

The reality of the situation? We are going to be smaller in size and need to operate at a reduced budget level.  ACE will do everything possible, including a closer review of temporary and district-funded student employees, to minimize reductions impacting staff but we can’t guarantee that everyone will have a position as the District works to adjust to a smaller budget.

Meanwhile, the District needs to continue to operate, classes need to run, supplies need to be procured and employees need to be fairly compensated. For FHDA staff, the cost of living continues to outpace any salary increase we have received over the past five years. If past experience is an indicator of future behavior, previous budget cuts and layoffs have shown that staff will be expected to take on more work with no additional compensation.  If we are truly going to address this budget crisis for what it is, a permanent reduction, any budget talk moving forward needs to include some form of compensation increase.

In other words, ACE will be going back to the table to get a pay increase that we deserve!


Classification Study:  What The Delay?

So what is the delay?  I went directly to our consultants to ask.  Their response “We are working through some issues with the ETS classification specifications to ensure that they are reflective of the work being performed as well as the needs of the department, colleges, and District.  The classification concepts and series has been areas where we needed further clarification and an overview perspective, which we are working through with ETS senior management. For example, we want to ensure that the classification specifications and structure reflect appropriate career paths and development opportunities for employees.  Also, technology changes so quickly and so we want to ensure that the classification specifications are written in a way to incorporate changes in technology.”  ETS is the final group of classifications we are waiting on.

As has been stated numerous times, nothing affects compensation more than properly assigned classification.  It is in our best interest to be patient and thorough.

Where does that leave us?  Koff has stated the final class descriptions should be delivered by the end of this week.  The Joint Labor Management Classification Committee (JLMCC) has a meeting scheduled for April 26 to review the recommendations, develop an appeal process and set dates for drop-in questions with Koff.

What you really want to know.  If the class descriptions are delivered by the 25th, look to have them distributed the first part of May.


Seniority List Update

Currently, the way Banner is calculating data for seniority isn’t correct and we are working with human resources and ETS to get this addressed as quickly as possible.  This is a priority for everyone involved and it is imperative that the list be as accurate as possible before reviewing any data with members.


Layoffs – Management Rights, Your Rights

The Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) has determined that it is solely a management right to implement a layoff as defined under California Education Code §88017.

“Classified employees may be laid off either for a lack of work or a lack of funds.  The employees to be laid off at the end of the school year shall be given written notice on or before April 29 informing them of their layoff effective at the end of the school year and of their displacement rights, if any, and reemployment rights. However, if the termination date of any specially funded program is other than June 30, the notice shall be given not less than 60 days prior to the effective date of their layoff”.

  • Lack of Funds – When a school district no longer has sufficient funds to support the positions at the college.
  • Lack of Work – When a position, and the work that belongs to that position, is no longer needed at the college.

During budget cuts, the District will cite a lack of funds as the rationale for the layoffs. However, there is an order that must be used when determining the individual who are laid off.

Seniority California Education Code §88127 – “Whenever an employee is laid off, the order of layoff within the class shall be determined by length of service. The employee who has been employed the shortest time in the class, plus higher classes, shall be laid off first. Reemployment shall be in the reverse order of layoff”.

ACE’s responsibility during a layoff are too:

  • insure the accuracy of the seniority list;
  • meet and confer with the District regarding any classification changes or reorganizations due to layoff; and
  • whenever possible, work with the District to place affected workers into vacant positions which they are qualified but do not have any right to the position. In the past we have been successful with this approach, but to be clear, the District is under no obligation to do this.

What happens to the work of laid off positions?
Every department suffering a position loss must re-organize itself, re-set its priorities or simply do without. Reality? The work will most likely be distributed among the remaining employees in the area.  To that end:

  • A classified employee may not be laid off if a short-term employee is retained to render a service that the classified employee is qualified to render.
  • No one can do overtime to replace the work.
  • No one outside the unit can do the work after the position is eliminated.This includes temporary workers, students, faculty, administrator or outside contractors.
  • An employee cannot be given more work than they can complete in an 8-hour day.
    • If you feel that you are being assigned more work than you can possibly complete in one day, do not work more than the 8 hours without your supervisor first approving overtime.
    • If you do not have enough hours in the day to complete the extra work, request a meeting and have your supervisor prioritize your work. You may request an ACE steward be present at this meeting.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact your ACE representative so we can address the issue. This is especially true if:

  • You are laid off and you know there are duties in your job that cannot be dropped (e.g. mandatory reports you prepare) and there is no plan to have it done within the unit.
  • You are uncomfortable telling your boss any of these things or you do tell them and they ignore you.

What constitutes a reorganization?
A reorganization may occur for various reasons, including:

  • Improving business efficiency
  • Reducing costs/budgetary reasons
  • Repositioning/aligning business units
  • To meet the strategic needs of the College/District
  • Provide a better service model

Some examples of what may be included in a reorganization include:

  • Change(s) in reporting relationships, supervisors and/or location
  • Creation of new departments; dispersing of existing departments
  • Creation of new positions; reallocation of existing vacant positions
  • Reclassification of multiple positions in conjunction with other actions
  • Reduction in Force

How does a reorganization work?

Articles 7 & 15 of the ACE Agreement cover the steps for implementing a reorganization.  Some of the basic rules include:

  • When a supervising manager plans to reorganize his or her department, the District shall notify the Union and the appropriate chief steward in writing prior to implementation to provide for an opportunity to meet and confer. If the Union does not respond within 15 working days, the changes shall be implemented as proposed.
    • The notification shall include: the proposed changes; impact, if any, on workers; date of proposed implementation; and the reason for the change.
    • If there is a request to meet, the parties shall meet and confer over the impact of the proposed reorganization.When appropriate, such discussions shall include identification of tasks and priorities of positions.
  • If no agreement is reached regarding job classifications effected by the reorganization, the parties will appeal to the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources and Equal Opportunity. Within thirty (30) working days of receiving an appeal the Vice Chancellor will render a written decision.
    • The decision of the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources may be appealed to a neutral party, jointly selected by the Union and the District. Within thirty (30) working days of receiving an appeal, the neutral party will render a final written decision.
    • The final decision of the neutral party will be binding.

If you have questions about the possibility of a reorganization in your department, please contact your ACE representative.

If I am laid off, do I have reemployment rights?
Yes, under California Education Code § 88117:

  • A person laid off because of lack of work or lack of funds shall be eligible for reemployment for a period of 39 months. The person’s reemployment shall take preference over new applicants.
  • If the person is reemployed in a new position and fails to complete the probationary period in the new position, he or she shall be returned to the reemployment list for the remainder of the 39-month period.

ACE Update 03.05.18: See You Next Wednesday, Dues Forgiveness, Negotiations Update, New Stewards & Retirement Planning

President’s Message

See You Next Wednesday

“I don’t think there’s one word that can describe a man’s life” – Charles Foster Kane, Citizen Kane.

Foothill Chief StewArt Hand, 1965 Alma Fire Stationard and Library Technician Senior Art Hand is no exception. Retired, prior to joining Foothill, one might have described Art’s successful career as phone company workman, firefighter, store manager, and recruiter. Or, one might have talked about his unwavering support as husband, father,  and friend. All of it would be true. In recent years, along with Art’s work at Foothill, one would also add the pride and joy he has for his new role as Pops,  a.k.a. grandfather.

Art has spent a few years at Foothill. 31.68  years to be exact (thank you CalPERS).  For twenty-five of those years, he has served as chief steward. My time working with Art has been relatively short, just shy of five years, but if I were to choose a few words to describe him I would use:

Advocate
Art Hand, 2018, Union StrongNot too long into his tenure at Foothill, Art needed, and received, help from his union representative.  Looking to give back, he attended the next site meeting to see how he could get involved. At the time, classified staff at Foothill-De Anza were represented by CSEA and as Art describes it, “in a compromise with CSEA officers who wanted to make me chapter chair, I agreed to serve as chief steward”.  And serve he did.  For a quarter of a century and for no other reason than to help his fellow workers. Always by listening, sometimes by taking action, never for the recognition, the number of staff Art has helped over the years are too numerous to count.

Facilitator
Every Wednesday, Art hosts the Foothill ACE officers to coffee and conversation. Lucky for us, it will continue into his retirement.  During these meetings the conversation covers issues pertinent to ACE but often turn to books, movies, current events and life in general. As tangential as the conversation may seem from collective bargaining and representation issues, it helps build trust, communication, collaboration and understanding among the ACE officers. As a result, we’ve learned we can count on each other during challenging times, we make better decisions as a group, and if you need a book or movie recommendation, Art has an ever expanding list of suggestions.  Most of them are pretty good.

Mensch
Art Hand Foothill College library renovation 1992A Mensch is many things and one simple thing.  A mensch does what is right because it is right towards family, towards colleagues, towards friends, towards strangers, at home and in public.  When people behave with honesty, integrity, consideration and respect they themselves prosper as does society at large. By spreading mensch-like behavior we can make our society happier, healthier and more successful. If you’ve been fortunate to meet Art, you’d know you’re in the presence of a mensch.

During his tenure as chief steward, Art never ventured from the three concepts he outlined below in his candidate statement during his first election: know our rights, maintain good communication, and foster a spirit of cooperation.

Art Hand candidate statement for chief steward, December 1992.

Art officially retires on March 30th.  There aren’t enough words to thank him for his service to the staff at Foothill.  His wit, wisdom, experience, and sense of humor have made ACE and the working conditions at FHDA better for all of us. If you’re so inclined, send him your thanks  – handart@fhda.edu.

To keep him grounded, and remind him that his work isn’t done yet, let me close by saying “Art, see you next Wednesday”.

In gratitude,

Chris White, ACE President
(650) 949-7789, office


Dues Forgiveness March 2018

ACE will forgive dues in your March paycheck (March 31).  For Classified Hourly employees, this will be reflected in your April 15 paycheck.

Why does ACE forgive dues? ACE works really hard to be as fiscally prudent with dues collected from members. When we spend less than we’ve budgeted for the year, we forgive dues. This year, because the classification study has taken longer than anticipated and re-classifications are on hold until it is completed, funds budgeted to cover costs associated with classification issues  – ACE pays half the cost for appeals – we’re on track to spend less than budgeted.

What does ACE spend dues money on? Access to representation was the main reason we chose to be an independent union and it is the largest expense in our annual budget.  Several months a year, our legal representation itemizes their bill, and the work they do on our behalf often exceeds the flat monthly fee we pay them.  Other expenses include potential legal costs such as: arbitration (ACE pays half), court filing fees and expert testimonies; accountants, insurance, financial audits and taxes; office supplies, web hosting and routine state fees for running a small business; and training for officers and stewards, food for site meetings and elective stipends for ACE officers.  We also have monies set aside for a strike fund and a 5% budget reserve.

Does ACE spend money collected from dues on political activities?  No.  ACE has separate Political Action Committee (PAC) to address political activities and it is funded solely by voluntary member contributions.


Negotiations Update

Cathleen Monsell, Chair of Negotiations

ACE has delayed going into negotiations until we have a better understanding of the District’s budget crisis. In the meantime, the District offered a proposal for all five collective bargaining units to consider jointly negotiating the 2017-2018 salary adjustment as a means to be more efficient and collaborative.  As each unit has interests and priorities unique to its members, this proposal was rejected.

We will be returning to the table to continue negotiations with the District sometime in the next week or so.


New ACE Stewards – Foothill and De Anza

ACE is pleased to announce the appointment of three new stewards.  For Foothill, Josh Pelletier will serve as chief steward, replacing retiring chief steward, Art Hand, and Catalina Rodriguez will serve as a steward.  For De Anza, Matt Trosper will join chief steward, Erika Flores as a steward.  The main difference between chief steward and steward, in addition to stewarding duties, chief stewards serve as a member of the ACE Executive Board.

Every steward for ACE has the responsibility, and authority, to enforce our Agreement, represent members in grievance and disciplinary proceedings, and work to build relationships with our members and management. Stewards are your first point of contact should you have an issue or a question regarding our Agreement.

Foothill
Chief Steward – Josh Pelletier

The son of a teacher, Josh understands the important role unions, and their stewards, have in the workplace.  In 2011, after receiving his MA in English and MFA in Fiction Writing from San Francisco State University, Josh published a novel and a collection of short stories, and served as an adjunct faculty member for several institutions, including Foothill.  He permanently joined Foothill as an instructional support coordinator in the Teaching and Learning Center in 2016, and like his predecessor, plans to stay here until he retires. Josh’s term runs until December 31, 2019.

Steward – Catalina Rodriguez

Catalina joined Foothill in 2016 as an enrollment services specialist in Admissions and Records.  She earned her bachelor’s degree in psychology and holds a master’s in business administration. Prior to coming to Foothill, Catalina spent 15 years as a financial advisor. Her current role, along with her combined education and work experience, have helped Catalina realize her love for listening and helping people find solutions to problems. Key attributes which will serve her well as a steward. Catalina is appointed to her new role until she resigns or is removed by action of the ACE Executive Board.

De Anza
Steward – Matt Trosper

From 2012-2017, Matt served as ACE Vice President at De Anza and has a solid understanding of our Agreement and the issues our members’ face.  Matt is appointed to his new role until he resigns or is removed by an action of the ACE Executive Board.

Retirement Planning Workshop flyer - CalPERS, Social Security and FHDA retirement benefits

Pre-Retirement Reduction in Contract

The Pre-Retirement Reduction in Contract allows classified staff who are eligible for service retirement too phase into actual retirement through a contract reduction (not less than 50% of their full-time contract) while maintaining full retirement credit and other benefits for a maximum of five years. Under any other type of reduction in contract, the portion the District pays a pro-rated to the percentage of the full-time contract you work. In other words, you pay more out of your pocket to maintain the same benefits and earn less service credit.

Pre-retirement reductions in contract are entirely voluntary, and while generally encouraged by the District, they are not an entitlement. To ensure the needs of a department are met, any reduction in contract is at the discretion of the department manager. The best place to start?  Have a conversation with your supervisor. Don’t wait! The deadline to submit your request is May 1.

ACE Article 17B: The Details

17B.1 Eligibility

Each full-time 12-month, 11-month, 10-month, or academic-day classified worker who meets the requirements of this article may reduce his/her contract from full-time to part-time while maintaining his/her retirement benefits pursuant to Education Code Section 88038 and Government Code Section 20905.

To be eligible for a pre-retirement reduction in contract the worker must:

17B.1.1  Have reached the age of 55 prior to the reduction in contract;

17B.1.2  Have been employed full-time for at least ten years in a classified position requiring membership in an appropriate California state retirement system; and

17B.1.3  Have served full-time without a break in service during the preceding five years.

This article shall be applicable only to classified workers who request a reduction in contract, who meet the criteria established in this section.

17B.2 Period of Reduced Contract

The maximum period during which a classified worker’s contract may be reduced under this article shall be five years. At the conclusion of the period during which a classified worker’s contract is reduced under this article, the worker shall retire.

17B.3  Rights and Benefits

A classified worker whose contract has been reduced under this article shall retain all paid benefits afforded full-time classified workers and shall receive the pro rata share of the salary he/she would have earned had he/she continued full-time. In addition, the worker shall retain on a pro rata basis, all other rights and benefits of permanent classified workers.

17B.4  Duties

A classified worker whose contract has been reduced under this article shall fulfill the appropriate pro rata share of the hours and classified duties that would have been required had the worker continued as a full-time worker.

17B.5  Contributions to the Retirement System

In compliance with Education Code Section 88038 and Government Code Section 20905, a classified worker whose contract has been reduced under this article shall contribute to the appropriate retirement system by payroll deduction the amount he/she would have contributed had he/she continued full-time. The District shall contribute to the appropriate retirement system the amount required by law.

17B.6  Request for Reduction in Contract

To implement the provisions of this article, a classified worker shall file a written request for a reduced contract specifying:

17B.6.1  That the request is pursuant to this article;

17B.6.2  The reduced contract the worker desires under this article, provided it is not less than one -half of a full contract; and

17B.6.3  The number of years during which the classified worker wishes his/her contract to be reduced under this article, provided the number of years does not exceed five.

The request shall be filed no later than May 1 preceding the college year during which the worker wishes the reduced contract to become effective. College year means July 1 to June 30. The request shall be filed with the appropriate supervisor with a copy to the Director of Human Resources. If the worker’s request is granted, it shall take effect at the beginning of the next college year and, unless during the first year of reduction in contract under this article the worker submits a written request to return to full-time employment at the beginning of the next college year, may be revoked only with the mutual consent of the worker and the District.

17B.7  Other Reductions in Contract

Nothing in this article shall prohibit a classified worker from requesting a reduction in contract outside of the provisions of this article nor shall it prohibit the District from granting such a request.

ACE Update 12.11.17: Happy Holidays, ACE Holiday Party, Thank You Matt, New ACE Officers

Happy Holidays From ACE

Dear Colleagues:

As I close out my first term as president of ACE, I wanted to thank all of you for your support and inspiration. From meeting new employees as well as speaking with FHDA veterans, I have gained a better understanding of the issues important to you and worked hard to address them. The results aren’t always perfect, the work is often slow going (hello classification study), and sometimes disheartening but it is always done with the goal to make your working conditions at FHDA the best they can be. A few of our accomplishments this past year include adding a holiday, opening working out of class opportunities to any FHDA employee before external candidates (this includes temporary employees), increasing the amounts awarded for travel and conference, educational assistance and the Bridge to Medicare program, and keeping your health benefits contribution rate for the 2018 plan year the same as it was in 2017. Not to mention the countless members we have represented to make certain they were treated fairly by management on issues around compensation or discipline.

But we’re not done. With challenging budget times ahead, ACE has been working hard to help the District identify budget saving opportunities before any budget reduction needs to take place.  One of the largest discretionary District budget expenditures, at nearly $2 million a year, is the use of temporary and district-funded student employees.  Some of these placements are legitimate, some are not. After reviewing five years of temporary employee assignments, ACE is working with the district to better identify how and what work is assigned to temporary and student employees to determine if some assignments could, and should, be eliminated before any permanent employee is affected by budget reductions. Or, if the work is necessary, can it be offered to permanent employees on an overtime basis?

Vacant positions are another opportunity for savings.  Currently, both campuses and the District are reviewing vacant positions to determine if they need to be refilled. Many of you have expressed concern to ACE why some positions are being filled and others aren’t when we know we have to reduce next year? This is where transparency gets a murky.  At the Foothill budget town hall, ACE specifically asked if there is a process which explains their rationale to refill or not and where the work goes if a position is left vacant, as ACE is very mindful that the work never really goes away. So far our questions have been followed by deafening silence. ACE will keep asking and when any position is formally eliminated by FHDA Board of Trustee action, ACE will demand an explanation on what happens to that work.

2018 isn’t without opportunity.  The results of our classification study will give us a better idea of the work that we do and if we’re compensated appropriately.  More importantly, moving forward it will serve as benchmark for newly created positions to determine if the work is the same as an existing position but is arbitrarily given a different classification.  This matters for reemployment rights should anyone be laid off.  Thanks to the collaborative efforts from all the bargaining units, like working with the District to share costs around health benefit contributions or forgoing cost of living adjustments during the last budget reduction cycle, the District has been able to save a large stability fund.  The $40 million in District one-time funds gives us a little time and room to negotiate things like workload compensation, early retirement incentives or possibly extend positions slated for reduction.

As I have stated on numerous occasions, ACE only works with the active participation and support from our members.  As a thank you, I hope to see you this week at one of our annual holiday parties.

Wishing you and yours a wonderful holiday season,


Chris White, ACE President
(650) 949-7789, office


Please join us for some holiday cheer.
Refreshments will be served.
Foothill
Wed., Dec. 13
Noon – 1 p.m
Toyon RoomDe Anza
Thurs. Dec. 14
Noon – 1 p.m.
Campus Center Conference Room B

Thank you, Matt!

After five years of service, Matt Trosper, our VP at De Anza is stepping down from the executive board.  If you’re on the De Anza campus and checked your email, even once, you’d know Matt is the guy constantly seeking ACE representatives for hiring committees.  He has also represented ACE on the College Council and the Instructional Planning & Budget Team (IPBT).  Thank you, Matt for your commitment and hard work to improve the working conditions of your colleagues at FHDA.


New ACE Officers

Terms run from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2019.

  • President: Chris White
  • Vice President, Central Services: Bill Baldwin
  • Vice President, De Anza:  Precious Gerardo
  • Chief Steward, Foothill:  Art Hand
  • Board Member/Seat 1 De Anza:  Keri Kirkpatrick
  • Board Member Foothill;  Christine Mangiameli

REMINDERS

Negotiations Update

Cathleen Monsell, Chair of Negotiations

Our current Agreement was set to expire on October 17, 2017.  As ACE is still reviewing the potential impact of the Districts budget on our members, combined with personnel changes in human resources, the District and ACE have agreed to extend our current Agreement through October 31, 2018 or until a successor Agreement is negotiated and ratified or if we reach an impasse on the negotiations, whichever comes first.


Classification Study: Reminder

We are waiting for the draft classification descriptions from the consultants which should be ready for review in November. Staff will have an opportunity to provide feedback in this process.

The preliminary information provided by the consultants at a Sept. 13 meeting was very promising. The four main themes from their work include: consolidating classifications which do the same work; title changes to more accurately reflect the current market; creation and/or elimination of classifications to reflect the work currently being done or not being done; and establishment of career ladders where applicable.  The Joint Labor Management Classification Committee (JLMCC) meets later this month to negotiate the effects of any changes to the classification structure, like combining classifications and what it means for seniority, etc.  We won’t address the compensation portion until the consultants have agreement from us on the content of the classification descriptions.

Reminders:

  1. We have already agreed with the district that NO ONE will go down, in pay or classification, as result of the consultants findings.  Read that again.  One more time and pass it on.
  2. Classifications are generalized and not every word from the PDQs will be on the final classification description. Positions and classification are two words that are often thought of as interchangeable; but in fact have very different meanings.  In a classification plan, a position is assigned a group of duties and responsibilities performed by one person. A classification may contain only one position, or may consist of a number positions.  When there are several positions assigned to one classification, it means the same title is appropriate for each position because the scope, level, duties, and responsibilities of each position assigned to the classification are sufficiently similar (but not necessarily identical); the same core knowledge, skills, and other requirements are appropriate for all positions; and the same salary range is equitable for all positions.
  3. The goals for this project:  To align job descriptions with the current roles and responsibilities of classified employees, create career ladders were appropriate, and conduct a market analysis of compensation in similar or like jobs in other districts.
  4. Authority:  A Joint Labor Management Classification Committee (JLMCC) was established to negotiate this process. Representing ACE are Cathleen Monsell, chair of negotiations, Chris White, ACE president, and Bradley Booth, attorney for ACE.  Representing the District are Myisha Washington from human resources, Lisa Mandy, De Anza administrator, and Kevin Harral, Foothill administrator.  Neither side has more authority and the consultants report to the committee.  ACE and the District mutually agreed to the selection of Koff & Associates after independent research and reference checks.