Category: Negotiations

  • ACE Update 03.04.19: Where Does The Work Go?; A Yeti; Negotiations & Classification Study Update; Pre-Retirement Reduction in Contract

    President’s Message

    Where Does the Work Go?

    Last month I reviewed the process the colleges and Central Services used to determine their position elimination choices. Those choices will be approved by the FHDA Board of Trustees at their March 4 meeting.  For ACE alone, it accounts for 41 FTE positions, approximately 10% of our unit. At first glance, it appears most are vacant, and technically they are, but half of them are vacant due to a combination of staff taking the Supplemental Retirement Plan (SRP) offer, positions being held vacant over the last year and the reassignment, layoff and reduction of a few others.  In other words, positions where work was actively getting done, which begs the age old question, where does the work go?

    Article 11 of our Agreement is pretty clear on the rules surrounding the work and the elimination of positions (even vacant ones).

    • A classified employee may not be laid off if a short-term employee is retained to render a service that the classified employee is qualified to render.
    • No worker can be required a worker to do overtime to replace the work.
    • No one outside the unit can do the work after the position is eliminated.This includes temporary workers, students, faculty, administrator or outside contractors.
    • An employee cannot be given more work than they can complete in an 8-hour day.
      • If you feel that you are being assigned more work than you can possibly complete in one day, do not work more than the 8 hours without your supervisor first approving overtime.
      • If you do not have enough hours in the day to complete the extra work, request a meeting and have your supervisor prioritize your work. You may request an ACE steward be present at this meeting.

    As the colleges begin their reorganization process, it’s clear there are more questions than answers. ACE has met with human resources and senior management regarding proposed reorganization, at this time mostly at Foothill, we have left our meetings with no definitive answers.  As I have said on numerous occasions, while the number of position cuts is pretty firm, a lot will change surrounding job duties and priorities between now and June 30, 2019.

    Of service,

    Chris White, ACE President
    (650) 949-7789, office

    “The fight is never about lettuce or grapes.  It is always about people”. – César Chávez


    Classification Study Update

    Summed up in two words, more delay.  At the end of January, the consults delivered their draft classification study report and compensation study analysis.  The Joint Labor Management Classification Committee (JLMCC) set a meeting for Feb. 28 – yes, it takes that long to find availability for six people – to discuss the results and start the negotiation process on potential approval by ACE members and the FHDA Board of Trustees as well what/wen implementation may happen.  And then the District canceled.  The meeting has been rescheduled for March 16.

    As a precaution to extraneous delays on the part of the District, our attorney sent the them the following notice in late January.In the past you have indicated that the District would not implement the results of the classification study until July 2019. Recently, ACE has learned that the District is telling classified employees that the study will not be implemented until July 2019. ACE has never agreed to a July 2019 implementation date. ACE believes that the study, when completed needs to be bargained with ACE which would include classifications,  salary and implementation and that need to be ratified by its membership. This is meant to put you on notice that ACE expects the District to bargain these issues in “good faith”; however, with the public statements of a July 2019 implementation it appears the District is acting unilaterally and has predetermined the results of any negotiations”. If the District cancels the March meeting, we will have our attorney address it appropriately.


    Negotiations Update

    Cathleen Monsell, Chair of Negotiations

    Reminder:  If you haven’t already done so, please take a moment to fill out our Annual Membership/Negotiations Survey.  Your input is very important and not only helps us decide the topics that we should negotiate on your behalf, but also how we can better serve our members and meet their needs. The survey closes this Friday, March 8, 2019.
    The survey link was sent to you by email from the FHDA Association of Classified Employees email address on Feb. 20.

    Yeti Spotting – Five-Percent Temporary Salary Adjustment

    Can it be true?  Will the elusive five-percent temporary salary adjustment, plus retroactive pay, appear in our March paycheck?  Yes.  That is the confirmation I have received from District payroll.I know, you’ve heard it before. Here is what is different. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), ACE and the other bargaining units signed with the District in December regarding the salary adjustment was very specific in terms of notifying the units if the adjustment could not be implemented for the March paycheck. “If the District cannot implement the agreed upon five-percent increase for 2018-18 by March 1, 2019, including all associated pay retroactive to July 2018, the District shall notify all bargaining units of the additional delay by March 1, 2019 and shall propose additional monetary consideration to address the continuing delay”.  In other words, there is a fiscal penalty to the District if they delay again.

    March 1 has passed and no such notice for an additional delay has been issued. Is that a Yeti I see?


    Pre-Retirement Reduction in Contract

    The Pre-Retirement Reduction in Contract allows classified staff who are eligible for service retirement too phase into actual retirement through a contract reduction (not less than 50% of their full-time contract) while maintaining full retirement credit and other benefits for a maximum of five years. Under any other type of reduction in contract, the portion the District pays a pro-rated to the percentage of the full-time contract you work. In other words, you pay more out of your pocket to maintain the same benefits and earn less service credit.

    Pre-retirement reductions in contract are entirely voluntary, and while generally encouraged by the District, they are not an entitlement. To ensure the needs of a department are met, any reduction in contract is at the discretion of the department manager. The best place to start?  Have a conversation with your supervisor. Don’t wait! The deadline to submit your request is May 1.

    ACE Article 17B: The Details

    17B.1 Eligibility

    Each full-time 12-month, 11-month, 10-month, or academic-day classified worker who meets the requirements of this article may reduce his/her contract from full-time to part-time while maintaining his/her retirement benefits pursuant to Education Code Section 88038 and Government Code Section 20905.

    To be eligible for a pre-retirement reduction in contract the worker must:

    17B.1.1  Have reached the age of 55 prior to the reduction in contract;

    17B.1.2  Have been employed full-time for at least ten years in a classified position requiring membership in an appropriate California state retirement system; and

    17B.1.3  Have served full-time without a break in service during the preceding five years.

    This article shall be applicable only to classified workers who request a reduction in contract, who meet the criteria established in this section.

    17B.2 Period of Reduced Contract

    The maximum period during which a classified worker’s contract may be reduced under this article shall be five years. At the conclusion of the period during which a classified worker’s contract is reduced under this article, the worker shall retire.

    17B.3  Rights and Benefits

    A classified worker whose contract has been reduced under this article shall retain all paid benefits afforded full-time classified workers and shall receive the pro rata share of the salary he/she would have earned had he/she continued full-time. In addition, the worker shall retain on a pro rata basis, all other rights and benefits of permanent classified workers.

    17B.4  Duties

    A classified worker whose contract has been reduced under this article shall fulfill the appropriate pro rata share of the hours and classified duties that would have been required had the worker continued as a full-time worker.

    17B.5  Contributions to the Retirement System

    In compliance with Education Code Section 88038 and Government Code Section 20905, a classified worker whose contract has been reduced under this article shall contribute to the appropriate retirement system by payroll deduction the amount he/she would have contributed had he/she continued full-time. The District shall contribute to the appropriate retirement system the amount required by law.

    17B.6  Request for Reduction in Contract

    To implement the provisions of this article, a classified worker shall file a written request for a reduced contract specifying:

    17B.6.1  That the request is pursuant to this article;

    17B.6.2  The reduced contract the worker desires under this article, provided it is not less than one -half of a full contract; and

    17B.6.3  The number of years during which the classified worker wishes his/her contract to be reduced under this article, provided the number of years does not exceed five.

    The request shall be filed no later than May 1 preceding the college year during which the worker wishes the reduced contract to become effective. College year means July 1 to June 30. The request shall be filed with the appropriate supervisor with a copy to the Director of Human Resources. If the worker’s request is granted, it shall take effect at the beginning of the next college year and, unless during the first year of reduction in contract under this article the worker submits a written request to return to full-time employment at the beginning of the next college year, may be revoked only with the mutual consent of the worker and the District.

    17B.7  Other Reductions in Contract

    Nothing in this article shall prohibit a classified worker from requesting a reduction in contract outside of the provisions of this article nor shall it prohibit the District from granting such a request.


  • 02.20.19: ACE Annual Negotiations/Membership Survey

    Dear ACE Members,

    Please check your email for a link to our annual negotiations/membership survey. Your input is very important and not only helps us decide the topics that we should negotiate on your behalf, but also how we can better serve our members and meet their needs.

    We will leave the survey link will remain open until March 8, 2019.

    Please fill it out as soon as possible.

    Thank you!

    Cathleen Monsell
    ACE Chair of Negotiations
    408-864-8800
    monsellcathleen@fhda.edu

  • ACE Update 1.07.19: Layoffs; Interest Payment Related to 5% Salary Adjustment; ACE Executive Board Authorizes Legal Action; Negotiations

    President’s Message
    Happy New Year. At first glance, 2019 appears to be another challenging year but look a little closer and there are reasons to be encouraged. Potentially good news surrounding layoffs and temporary relief brought by the new state funding formula could minimize the actual reductions the District has to make. Challenges surrounding reorganization and the classification study remain. These challenges are not insurmountable but will require communication, flexibility and whole lot of patience.

    Layoffs
    The District still needs to reduce its budget by $12 million dollars beginning July 1, 2019, but the actual number of layoffs to achieve this target has been significantly reduced. How?

    First, ACE and the District agreed to a process for recruitment and hiring to retain as many vacancies as possible. ACE extended the use of temporary workers in vacant positions to help the District save money and leave vacant, but needed, positions open as an option for placing affected employees and minimize the impact of bumping.
    Second, the Board of Trustees approved the Supplemental Retirement Plan (SPR), providing more vacancies and/or opportunity for savings. For ACE, there were 29 members who took advantage of this historic opportunity. I recognize what a difficult decision this was for many to make and, with potential position elimination, some felt they had no other choice. It is bittersweet (don’t get me started on the vast amount of institutional knowledge walking out the door) but the opportunity these vacancies provide to those who remain is significant.
    Third, through the actual budget reduction process. De Anza set out with the intent to minimize the number of classified staff laid off. Using savings from vacant positions and retirements facilitated by the SRP as well as reorganizing to better align staffing with college goals, in her December 13 message, Interim President Espinosa-Pieb announced De Anza will not layoff any classified staff and still be able to meet their budget reduction target. To minimize bumping, human resources has been working with Foothill and Central Services to reach the same goal. They’re very close.
    Fourth, the new funding formula from the state, which focuses on student success and access and includes a few years of hold-harmless funding, adds a few million to our revenue and gives the District a couple more years to stabilize enrollment. With the old funding formula additional cuts would have needed to me made.

    Reorganization and Management Right of Assignment
    As noted above, reorganization is necessary if the colleges and District are to meet their budget reduction targets, Critical vacancies need to be filled, changes in student demand, state mandates, and resources dictate we must operate different. Staffing can be affected by this in a couple different ways.

    Through administrative reassignment (Article 7.4.2) which moves a worker from a position targeted for elimination to a different department to fill needs and avoid layoff.
    Redistribution or prioritization of job duties different than previously handled to account for vacated positions which aren’t refilled or due to changing priorities. That doesn’t mean that the District can make you do work out of your classification without paying you more, nor does it mean it can assign you more work than you can do in your 8 hours of work but they do have the right to determine what work the want done. ACE’s role is to make certain they follow process outlined in CA ed code and our Agreement.

    Classification Study
    We have 98% of the classification descriptions approved and a significant portion of the compensation portion completed. At first glance, the results are promising. Now the Joint Labor Management Classification Committee needs to evaluate the results and determine how best to move forward. With budget reductions, do we wait? The District would like too but they can’t unilaterally decided to do so. This is a negotiated item and refusal to take any type of action would constitute an Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) on their part. We should reject the notion that we only focus on reductions and any changes to improve how we operate, build better systems and processes, provide opportunity for growth and evaluate how we compensate workers must wait until this crisis is over. The goal for this study continues to be to align job descriptions with the current roles and responsibilities of classified employees, develop career ladders where appropriate, and conduct a market analysis of compensation in similar or like jobs in other districts. Our budget crisis is dictating we must change. We need the information collected through the study to help us better navigate and prioritize whatever that change ultimately turns out to be.

    Taking all of this into consideration, I have a million questions about the specific, as i’m sure you do too, but for the moment I am cautiously optimistic the District won’t have to do any layoffs. That’s a huge change from December. With a little more patience, flexibility and compromise, perhaps we can be certain there are no layoffs.

    Of service,

    Chris White, ACE President
    (650) 949-7789, office

    “The fight is never about lettuce or grapes. It is always about people”. – César Chávez


    Interest Payment for Five Percent Salary Adjustment Delay

    As you know, with ongoing technical difficulties and regulatory demands, the District will not be able to implement the five percent temporary salary adjustment until March. Turning our frustration and anger into action, ACE and the other bargaining units worked collectively to hold the District accountable and negotiated additional compensation for employees due to the delay in implementation.

    The District has agreed:

    • For every employee in active status as of January 2019, an interest payment of $160 will be included in January 2019 payroll.
    • If, for any reason, the $160 is not included in the January 2019 payroll, the District will provide an interest payment of $170 in the February 2019 payroll.
    • Employees who separated from the District in December 2018 will receive an additional $100 when they receive their retroactive pay from the five-percent increase.
    • If the District cannot implement the agreed upon five-percent increase for 2018-18 by March 1, 2019, including all associated pay retroactive to July 2018, the District shall notify all bargaining units of the additional delay by March 1, 2019 and shall propose additional monetary consideration to address the continuing delay.

    Negotiations Update

    At the first negotiations meeting, held December 11, the newly elected team appointed Cathleen Monsell to serve as Chair of Negotiations for the duration of the Agreement.  The chair serves as a member of the ACE Executive Board, coordinates meetings with the negotiating team and the District, provides updates to the membership, and serves on the Joint Labor Management Benefits Committee.

    The team is developing a survey to solicit membership feedback on items to negotiate.   Look for it in late January/early February. Your feedback is important.

    A couple things to keep in mind regarding negotiations:

    1. It’s a pay-to-play system.  We have to give something to get something.
    2. Items involving financial consideration are impacted by the Governor’s state budget proposal (the draft is released in late January and finalized in mid May) and the District’s financial health.

     Staff Development Leave Committee Member Needed

    ACE needs a representative for the Staff Development Leave (SDL) Committee.  This committee is comprised of members from ACE, CSEA, POA, Teamsters and human resources and works collectively to approve SDLs for qualified members.  The committee meets in early February to review and approve applications and then works by email to approve updates/changes to approved leaves throughout the year.

    If you are interested in serving, please contact Chris White by this Friday, January 11.

    Please note this is a district wide committee and requires members to be able to attend meetings on the Foothill campus.


    ACE Executive Board Authorizes Legal Action Against CalPERS

    At the December 12 board meeting, the ACE Executive Board authorized up to $50,000 for our attorney to pursue legal action against CalPERS regarding their determination the five-percent salary adjustment for 2018-19 did not qualify as pensionable income.  Following CalPERS rules, the negotiated temporary salary increase was purposely placed on the salary schedule so it would qualify as regular pensionable income.  Why CalPERS has determined it does not qualify  is puzzling, particularly since CalSTRS has determined it does and both agencies are subject to the same pension reform rules.

    Why does it matter?
    Simply put, increases in compensation impact your final retirement benefit.  As the state changes our funding formula, including how cost of living adjustments (COLA) are allocated, they affect all community colleges and could mean we negotiate salary increases for a single year vs. an ongoing basis, at east through the hold harmless phase of the new funding structure. That change should not be detrimental to workers retirement benefits.

    Why is ACE taking legal action and not the District?
    CalPERS decision affects employees in all bargaining units as well as administrators. I can’t answer why the District chose not to take a more aggressive response on behalf of their employees but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t. Often, one group has to lead the fight which benefits many, a core concept of labor unions. You should know our attorney doesn’t recommend legal action unless they strongly believe they have a winning case. They don’t want to waste our time or money. The funds authorized here are meant to cover court filing fees, expert testimony and any other cost associated with pursuing this action, excluding our attorney’s time to represent ACE in this action.That is covered under the monthly stipend we pay them.


    Thank You

    As new officers begin their tenure in January, I wanted to take a moment to thank a couple of ACE board members who will be stepping down or changing roles.

    Annette PerezAnnette Perez will be changing roles with ACE, moving from treasurer to board member, Central Services. Serving as treasurer since ACE was incorporated in 2009, Annette has been steadfast in her role to make certain we are responsible with members’ dues and ensuring the fiscal health of ACE. Lucky for us, she isn’t stepping down all together and will serve as a board member so we can continue to benefit from her experience and insight.

    Scott Olsen has served as board member for Central Services since January of 2017.  In that short period of time he has shown himself to put the interest of members first and always operated from the position of improving ACE for our membership as a whole. Scott will continue to work on some special projects on behalf of ACE and I am certain he will remain a key contributing member of this organization for years to come.


    Wanted:   Central Services Chief Steward
    by Chris White, ACE President

    ACE strives to have a vibrant, active and engaged membership. Knowledgeable, well versed, engaged stewards are essential to the success of an engaged membership. Stewards primary roles are to:

    • enforce our Agreement;
    • represent workers in grievance and disciplinary proceedings; and
    • build relationships with members and management in the workplace.

    Elected by the membership to two-year terms, ACE stewards serve in addition to their full-time FHDA job. The position is voluntary with ACE providing an optional $250 monthly stipend.  However, most don’t do this work for the money.  They do it because they want to help their colleagues.

    Per our Agreement, release time is granted so stewards can meet with workers and management to resolve issues. It is important to remember there are no definitive answers on the best way to approach an issue but stewards start from the point of view that they will represent a member fairly, in good faith, and without discrimination by:

    • listening to all points of view carefully;
    • working with people on their problems;
    • knowing when to tell management or members they are wrong and saying so (politely);
    • securing the facts;
    • knowing when to ask for help; and
    • understanding the members and supervisors as individuals.

    Article 5.3 of the ACE Constitution clearly defines the role of steward with our organization.  Article 6 of our Agreement grants stewards the right to leave their permanent assignment during work time to perform the duties of a steward.

    Article 5.3 Steward(s) – ACE Constitution
    Chief Stewards from each location are elected to office as part of the Executive Board as described in Article 10. Up to six (6) additional stewards are appointed by the Executive Board. Stewards serve until they resign their position or are removed by action of the Executive Board and/or the Chief Steward. Stewards are members in good standing.
    a. Duties of the Chief Stewards

    1. Chair the Stewards Council and report activities of Stewards to the Executive Board in closed session.
    2. Be responsible for recruiting stewards and presenting candidates to the Executive Board for approval.

    b. Duties of the Chief Stewards and Steward(s)

    1. Represent their respective jurisdiction in all membership meetings in the absence of the members.
    2. Be the first line of contact with administrative or supervisory staff subject to this Constitution.
    3. Be responsible for the enforcement of all applicable collective bargaining agreements in their respective jurisdictions.
    4. Be responsible for holding management accountable for all applicable safety and occupational health laws, rules and regulations, and are responsible for notifying appropriate administrative or supervisory staff of unsafe working conditions.
    5. Shall have copies of the Constitution and all necessary working agreements available at all times.

    Stewardship requires subordination of personal interests to those interests that represent the highest good of the members. Stewards shall have no greater rights than any other member of the ACE.

    Article 6- Steward(s) – ACE Agreement
    6.1 Number –The District recognizes the right of the Union to designate up to 14 stewards and 14 alternates provided that an alternate will be released to perform the duties of a steward only when the steward is unable to perform those duties.

    6.2 Notification – Once a year, the Union shall notify the Director of Human Resources, with a copy to the supervisor, of the names of the stewards and alternates and the group they represent. If a change is made, the District shall be advised in writing of such change.

    6.3 Leaving His/Her Assignment – After notifying her/his immediate supervisor, the steward shall be permitted to leave her/his normal work during reasonable times in order to assist in informal resolution of potential grievances and in investigation, preparation, writing, and presentation of grievances. The stewards shall advise the supervisor of the grievant of her/his presence.
    The steward is permitted to discuss any problem with all workers immediately concerned, and, if appropriate, to attempt to achieve settlement in accordance with the grievance procedure, if possible on an informal basis.

    6.4 Emergencies – If, due to a bonafide emergency, an adequate level of service cannot be maintained in the absence of a steward where he/she is requested to assist, the steward shall be permitted to leave her/his normal work only after the emergency no longer exists.

    6.5 Authority – Stewards shall have the authority to file grievances as specified in Article 12, Section 12.2.2.

    Next Step
    If you’re interesting in serving as chief steward or stewarding in general, please send an email to whitechris@fhda.edu.